2 franchise brands scored by real SBA loan performance data.
Showing 1-2 of 2 franchises in Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite)
The question every serious franchise investor asks before committing capital is not "Is this a growing industry?" but rather "Does this specific brand have the operational track record, financial transparency, and competitive positioning to protect and grow my investment?" When evaluating the All Star Wireless franchise opportunity, that question takes on added complexity. The wireless telecommunications retail sector sits inside one of the largest and fastest-growing industries on earth — the global wireless telecommunications market was estimated at USD 1.80 trillion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 3.03 trillion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 7.66%. Within that macro context, All Star Wireless operates as a micro-scale retail concept headquartered in Michigan, currently comprising just 3 total units with 1 franchised location, a footprint that classifies it firmly as an emerging or micro-franchise system rather than a scaled national brand. The website associated with the brand points to starwireless.com, and research into entities operating under the All Star Wireless name reveals a history of small, localized dealership operations across markets including Las Vegas, Nevada, Phoenix, Arizona, and Chambersburg, Pennsylvania — at least some of which functioned as T-Mobile agents rather than as a proprietary franchise system. The Better Business Bureau lists one entity named Allstar Wireless in Waterford, Michigan, as out of business and not BBB accredited. For investors, this context is essential: the All Star Wireless franchise opportunity must be evaluated not against the promise of the wireless industry's trillion-dollar tailwinds, but against the realities of a very early-stage, very small-footprint franchise system with a PeerSense FPI Score of 44, which is classified as Fair — meaning it warrants careful, data-driven scrutiny before any capital commitment. The wireless telecommunications carrier industry — classified under NAICS 517112 and 517312 — represents one of the most structurally significant sectors in the global economy, and its growth trajectory creates genuine long-term opportunity for retail-level franchise operators. The total addressable market carries estimates ranging from approximately 300 billion dollars domestically with a 5% CAGR to a global figure of USD 894.8 billion in 2024, projected to reach USD 1680.2 billion by 2035 at a 5.9% CAGR. A separate analysis pegs global market size at USD 1774.88 billion in 2024, with a projected expansion to USD 3458.48 billion by 2034 at a 7.6% CAGR. The demand drivers underpinning this growth are structural and durable: the continued rollout of 5G networks, the proliferation of Internet of Things technologies, rising mobile data consumption driven by streaming services and online gaming, and favorable government policies promoting digitalization and rural broadband deployment. The household segment accounted for the largest share of the wireless services market in 2024, driven by rising smartphone adoption and escalating mobile data usage among residential consumers — and critically, the percentage of U.S. households relying exclusively on wireless service continues to increase year over year, eliminating the ceiling on addressable customer volume. Cellular and mobile telephone services dominated market segmentation in 2024 and are projected to grow substantially as 5G infrastructure moves beyond enhanced mobile broadband into mission-critical applications including autonomous transport and smart manufacturing. The transition from voice-centric to data-centric service models continues to reshape consumer expectations and revenue streams at the retail level. That said, risks are real: market saturation generates intense competition among major carriers including AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and their authorized retailer networks; regulatory complexity around data privacy and network standards introduces compliance burdens; and rapid technological change can outpace the adaptation capabilities of smaller operators. For an All Star Wireless franchise investor, the industry tailwinds are meaningful, but the brand's positioning within a highly competitive, carrier-dependent retail environment demands rigorous analysis of the specific business model and support structure. The All Star Wireless franchise investment profile presents significant informational gaps that directly affect the ability to conduct a complete cost-of-ownership analysis. The franchise fee, total investment range, liquid capital requirement, net worth threshold, royalty rate, and advertising fund contribution are not published in available disclosure materials, making it impossible to benchmark All Star Wireless franchise cost directly against sector averages without additional due diligence through the Franchise Disclosure Document. For context and comparison, wireless telecommunications franchise opportunities at the scaled end of the market illustrate what investment thresholds look like in this category: Wireless Zone, a Verizon-authorized franchisor operating under the Round Room parent company with 790 units nationwide as of year-end 2025, carries a franchise fee of 1,000 to 25,000 dollars and a total investment range of 201,875 to 532,600 dollars, with liquid capital requirements of 175,000 dollars and a veteran incentive of 50% off franchise and transfer fees. Total Wireless, offered through Victra — the nation's largest Total Wireless master agent and Verizon's largest exclusive authorized retailer — operates as a dealer program rather than a traditional franchise but requires liquid capital of 70,000 to 100,000 dollars per store and demands exclusivity, meaning dealers cannot carry competing carrier products. These benchmarks establish that entry into wireless telecommunications retail, even in dealer or franchise formats backed by national carrier relationships, typically requires six-figure liquid capital and total investments that can approach or exceed half a million dollars for established brands. A micro-system like All Star Wireless with 3 total units and 1 franchised location may carry a lower initial cost threshold, but that potential accessibility must be weighed against the absence of the scale, carrier relationships, and operational infrastructure that justify higher investment in more established systems. Prospective investors should formally request the current Franchise Disclosure Document and direct their analysis to Items 5, 6, and 7, which govern initial fees, ongoing fees, and estimated initial investment, respectively. Understanding daily operations within the All Star Wireless franchise model requires contextualizing what wireless telecommunications retail actually demands at the unit level. Employee reviews on Indeed.com for All Star Wireless locations in Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Chambersburg describe work that is fundamentally sales and customer service driven, with compensation structured on a commission basis — a model consistent with how authorized dealer and carrier agent operations function across the industry. One former sales representative review from 2019 described operational conditions including lack of official breaks and environmental concerns, indicating that at least some All Star Wireless locations operated with lean staffing and minimal overhead infrastructure. For prospective franchisees, the staffing model in wireless retail typically centers on a small team of sales representatives and a store manager, with labor costs representing one of the primary variable expenses alongside inventory. General franchise ownership research indicates that owner-operators in small retail formats frequently work directly in the store, particularly in the early phases of operation, while multi-unit owners who can generate sufficient cash flow across locations may eventually hire managers and transition to a more supervisory role focused on reviewing financial statements and operational reports. Training program specifics, territory exclusivity terms, format options such as kiosk versus inline retail, and multi-unit development expectations are not published in available All Star Wireless materials and would need to be confirmed through direct engagement with the franchisor and review of the FDD. The overall rating for working at All Star Wireless on Indeed.com is 3.0 out of 5 stars, a data point that reflects the employee experience rather than franchisee satisfaction directly, but which provides meaningful signal about operational culture and management consistency across locations. Item 19 financial performance data is not disclosed in the current Franchise Disclosure Document for All Star Wireless. This is a significant due diligence consideration: Item 19 of the FDD is the section where franchisors may voluntarily provide financial performance representations, including average unit revenue, median revenue, and top-quartile and bottom-quartile performance data. When a franchisor does not provide Item 19 disclosure, prospective investors cannot rely on any earnings claims made verbally or in marketing materials — those claims are unsubstantiated and legally unenforceable. For a system with only 3 total units and 1 franchised location, the absence of Item 19 data is not unusual from a regulatory standpoint, but it materially limits the ability to project unit-level economics or estimate payback period. Industry-level benchmarks for wireless telecommunications retail provide partial guidance: the broader wireless carrier market is estimated at approximately 300 billion dollars domestically with consistent growth, and retail-level operators benefit from both hardware sales and service plan commissions, but margins in carrier-authorized retail are notoriously thin, with some operators describing the current market as a low-margin game where royalty obligations — typically calculated on gross sales before rent or payroll in traditional franchise structures — can feel like a significant drag on net profitability. The prior operating history of All Star Wireless entities provides cautionary context: a 2013 review from a manager at the Las Vegas location stated the company was having financial problems and was bound to close without adequate finances, and that the company did close after approximately one year in business. This historical data point does not necessarily define the current franchise opportunity, but it reinforces the imperative for prospective investors to conduct thorough financial due diligence, model conservative revenue scenarios, and validate any financial projections through conversations with existing franchisees and independent accountants before committing capital to an All Star Wireless franchise investment. The growth trajectory of the All Star Wireless franchise system, at 3 total units with 1 franchised location, places it in the earliest stage of franchise development — a scale at which growth metrics are difficult to calculate with statistical confidence but at which opportunity for early-mover positioning exists if the underlying business model is sound. For comparison within the wireless telecommunications franchise category, Wireless Zone grew its unit count by 75.6% over three years and opened 44 new stores in 2025 alone, closing that year with 790 units nationwide and earning the rank of number 87 in Entrepreneur's Franchise 500 for 2026 — its highest ranking across nine consecutive years on that list. Victra's Total Wireless dealer program opened its 300th store on December 22, 2025, with locations spread across 30 states, demonstrating that dealer and franchise models in wireless retail can achieve meaningful scale when backed by strong carrier relationships and capital resources. The competitive moat available to any wireless retail operator is substantially defined by carrier affiliation: access to Verizon, T-Mobile, or AT&T authorized dealer status provides brand recognition, inventory access, and marketing co-op support that independent operators cannot replicate. Whether All Star Wireless maintains active carrier agency agreements — earlier research indicated some operations functioned as T-Mobile agents — is a critical question that determines the brand's competitive positioning and long-term viability. The broader wireless industry's commitment to 5G deployment, with the global market projected to nearly double from 1.80 trillion dollars in 2025 to 3.03 trillion dollars by 2032, creates a rising-tide environment, but rising tides do not equally lift all vessels, and a 3-unit micro-franchise system must demonstrate a credible pathway to scale and differentiation to compete against established authorized retailer networks backed by national carrier resources and multi-hundred-million-dollar operational budgets. The ideal candidate for the All Star Wireless franchise opportunity is likely an entrepreneurially minded individual with direct experience in wireless retail, telecom sales, or consumer electronics — someone who understands carrier commission structures, device financing programs, and the customer service rhythms of wireless plan sales. Given the system's current scale of 3 total units and 1 franchised location, a prospective franchisee should be comfortable operating in an early-stage brand environment where corporate infrastructure, training systems, and operational playbooks may not be as fully developed as those available from a 500-unit or 800-unit franchise system. The territory structure, franchise agreement term length, renewal conditions, transfer rights, and geographic availability of the All Star Wireless franchise are not published in available materials and would need to be addressed directly through the FDD review and franchisor conversations. Historical All Star Wireless operations were identified in Las Vegas, Nevada, Phoenix, Arizona, and Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, suggesting the brand has tested markets across multiple regions, though whether those markets are available for new franchise development or have been abandoned is unclear. Multi-unit development interest may be relevant given that the wireless retail model — like most commission-driven retail formats — tends to achieve more sustainable economics at multiple locations where overhead can be distributed and management leverage can be applied. Investors who have previously operated as carrier authorized dealers or who have management backgrounds in wireless retail will carry a meaningful informational advantage when evaluating the operational realities of this model. Synthesizing the available data, the All Star Wireless franchise opportunity sits at an unusual intersection: it operates inside one of the most economically significant industries in the global economy, one projected to grow from 1.80 trillion dollars in 2025 to over 3 trillion dollars by 2032 at a 7.66% CAGR, yet the brand itself presents with only 3 total units, 1 franchised location, a PeerSense FPI Score of 44 classified as Fair, no published investment financials, no Item 19 financial performance disclosure, and a historical record that includes at least one entity operating under a similar name that the Better Business Bureau lists as out of business. That combination makes All Star Wireless a franchise opportunity that demands intensive independent due diligence rather than investment based on industry momentum alone. The absence of financial performance transparency is not disqualifying for all investors — early-stage franchise systems sometimes offer ground-floor positioning at favorable economics — but it does shift the burden of financial modeling entirely onto the prospective franchisee and their advisors. For investors seriously evaluating wireless telecommunications franchise opportunities, comparison with scaled alternatives like Wireless Zone — with its 790 units, 75.6% three-year growth rate, 44 new stores opened in 2025, ranked number 87 in Entrepreneur's Franchise 500 for 2026, and veteran incentive of 50% off franchise fees — and Total Wireless dealer programs requiring 70,000 to 100,000 dollars in liquid capital per store provides essential benchmarking context. PeerSense provides exclusive due diligence data including SBA lending history, FPI score, location maps with Google ratings, FDD financial data, and side-by-side comparison tools that allow investors to evaluate All Star Wireless against every other wireless telecommunications franchise opportunity in the database with rigor and objectivity. Explore the complete All Star Wireless franchise profile on PeerSense to access the full suite of independent franchise intelligence data.
The question every serious franchise investor must answer before committing capital is deceptively simple: does this brand operate in a market large enough to sustain a thriving business, and does it have the operational infrastructure to help a franchisee succeed? For anyone researching the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise, that question is both more complicated and more important than it might initially appear. Operating under the website domain pagi-inc.ca, Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi occupies a category — Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) — that sits at the intersection of one of the most transformative technology transitions in modern history and a consumer demand curve that shows no signs of reversal. The global wireless telecommunications carriers market was valued at approximately USD 1,806.36 billion in 2024, making it one of the largest addressable markets any franchise investor could conceivably target. Despite that enormous market backdrop, the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise currently operates as a single-unit system with one franchised location and zero company-owned units, placing it at the earliest and most developmental stage of franchise system growth. That contrast — between the colossal market it operates within and the embryonic scale of its current franchise footprint — is the central analytical tension that any potential Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise investor must resolve through rigorous independent due diligence. This analysis, prepared by PeerSense research staff, is not promotional material produced by the franchisor; it is an independent assessment designed to give prospective investors the factual foundation they need to evaluate this opportunity with clear eyes and a complete picture of both the upside and the uncertainty. The industry tailwinds supporting any franchise operating in the wireless telecommunications carriers space are, by almost any measure, extraordinary. The global wireless telecommunications carriers market is projected to reach USD 3,458.48 billion by 2034, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 7.6 percent — a trajectory that means the total addressable market will nearly double in value over the next decade. A separate forecast values the global wireless telecommunications market at USD 1.80 trillion in 2025, rising to USD 1.94 trillion in 2026 and potentially reaching USD 3.03 trillion by 2032 at a CAGR of 7.66 percent. These are not niche projections; they represent convergent analyses from multiple independent research sources that collectively paint a picture of sustained, secular expansion. The primary engine driving this growth is the global rollout of 5G infrastructure, which is expected to revolutionize industries ranging from autonomous vehicles and smart cities to advanced IoT applications and industrial automation — all of which create downstream demand for telecommunications products, services, and support. The cellular IoT market, a critical sub-segment, saw module shipments grow 23 percent year-over-year in Q1 2025, building on a 15 percent year-over-year increase in 2024, while the cellular IoT module revenue market is expected to grow at 17 percent year-over-year through 2025. Global cellular IoT connections exceeded 3.8 billion by the end of 2024 and are projected to reach 6.5 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of over 9 percent, with cellular IoT revenues expected to hit $28 billion by 2030. The private cellular network segment adds another layer of opportunity, with global private cellular network revenue projected to grow from $5.7 billion in 2025 to $12.2 billion by 2028 — a 114 percent increase in just three years, driven by the emergence of Network-as-a-Service business models that reduce entry costs for enterprise clients. For an investor evaluating the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise opportunity, these macro dynamics represent the rising tide that could lift a well-positioned operator with genuine telecommunications expertise and local market knowledge. Because Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi is at the single-unit stage of franchise development, the financial parameters of the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise investment — including the franchise fee, total investment range, royalty structure, advertising fund contribution, and minimum liquid capital and net worth requirements — are not detailed in the publicly available profile data for this system. Rather than treat that as the end of the analytical conversation, it is more instructive to benchmark what a franchise investment in the wireless telecommunications carriers category typically looks like based on industry-wide data, so that any prospective Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise investor can arrive at due diligence conversations with an informed frame of reference. Across the broader franchising landscape in 2025, initial franchise fees typically range from $20,000 to $50,000, though capital-intensive industries with significant infrastructure requirements can push initial fees above $75,000. Ongoing royalty fees generally fall between 4 and 8 percent of gross sales across most franchise categories, while professional services and technology-oriented franchises frequently command royalty rates between 8 and 12 percent of gross sales given the specialized support and intellectual property involved. Advertising fund contributions across the franchise industry average between 1 and 4 percent of net sales. Total investment ranges in franchising vary enormously — from under $10,000 for purely service-based home-based models to millions of dollars for capital-intensive brick-and-mortar concepts — but mobile and low-overhead service franchises increasingly cluster below the $150,000 total investment threshold, a figure that has made them among the fastest-growing franchise categories by unit count in recent years. A properly outfitted mobile service vehicle alone can cost between $50,000 and $70,000, which establishes a realistic floor for the equipment component of any mobile telecommunications service franchise. Prospective investors in the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise should request the complete Franchise Disclosure Document directly from the franchisor, scrutinize all 23 items of the FDD with a qualified franchise attorney, and use the general industry benchmarks above as a calibration tool when evaluating whether the specific fees and investment requirements disclosed represent fair market terms for the category. The operational model of a franchise in the wireless telecommunications carriers category is shaped by a distinctive combination of technical expertise requirements, regulatory compliance obligations, and customer service intensity that distinguishes it meaningfully from food service or retail franchise models. The Federal Communications Commission and its Canadian regulatory equivalents impose a compliance framework on wireless telecommunications operators that requires franchisees to stay current on spectrum regulations, consumer protection rules, and service disclosure standards — a layer of operational complexity that most consumer-facing franchise categories do not face. Given that the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise operates under a Canadian domain (pagi-inc.ca), prospective investors should anticipate that Canadian telecommunications regulations, which are administered by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, will be a relevant operational consideration. Staffing in a telecommunications service franchise typically requires personnel who can perform multiple technical and customer-facing roles simultaneously — an operational reality that the broader mobile franchise sector has identified as one of its most significant human capital challenges, particularly because employees must be capable of working independently, embodying technical competence, and delivering a consistent customer experience without the supervisory density available in a fixed retail location. Training and onboarding quality are therefore disproportionately important to franchisee success in this category, and prospective investors should probe deeply during the discovery process about the duration of initial training, whether it includes hands-on technical components, what ongoing field support looks like, and whether the franchisor provides access to proprietary technology platforms, supply chain relationships, or marketing programs that would be materially difficult for an independent operator to replicate. Territory structure and exclusivity provisions are equally critical in telecommunications, where geographic market density and spectrum availability can create meaningful differences in addressable customer bases between adjacent markets. Multi-unit expectations, absentee ownership feasibility, and the realities of the owner-operator model should all be explored directly with the franchisor and with the single existing franchisee in the system before any investment commitment is made. Item 19 financial performance data is not disclosed in the current Franchise Disclosure Document for the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise. This is a material fact for any investor conducting serious due diligence, and its implications deserve careful analysis rather than dismissal. In 2025, 94 percent of franchisors across the industry disclose revenue data in Item 19 of their FDD, 56 percent disclose operating costs, 53 percent disclose profitability metrics, and 32 percent provide full profit and loss statements — meaning that a franchisor's decision not to disclose financial performance representations places it in the minority of the franchise industry by contemporary standards. Franchisors are not legally required to provide earnings information, but any financial performance claims they make — in any context, including sales presentations — must be disclosed and substantiated in Item 19, and if a franchisor chooses not to provide financial performance representations, the FDD must include a specific disclaimer to that effect. For investors evaluating the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise opportunity, the absence of Item 19 disclosure means that revenue and profitability benchmarking must rely on industry-level data rather than system-specific performance figures. The broader wireless telecommunications carriers sector generated global revenues estimated at USD 1.80 trillion in 2025, with revenue for global wireless telecommunications carriers expected to climb at a CAGR of 0.2 percent to an estimated $1.9 trillion in 2025, including anticipated growth of 2.6 percent in 2025 alone. The cellular and mobile telephone services segment dominated the market in 2024 and is projected to grow substantially through the decade. These macro figures establish the scale of the opportunity but cannot substitute for unit-level financial data in assessing the earnings potential of a specific franchise location. Prospective investors should request audited financial statements from the franchisor, conduct independent interviews with the existing franchisee, and engage a certified public accountant with franchise industry experience to model realistic scenarios before making any capital commitment to the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise investment. At a single franchised unit, the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise system is at the absolute earliest stage of what could become a multi-unit growth story — or it could represent a franchise concept that remains a micro-system indefinitely. That distinction matters enormously to an investor evaluating this as a ground-floor opportunity versus a proven system with demonstrated replicability. The history of mobile communications provides useful context for understanding why the telecommunications space remains so fertile for entrepreneurial entrants: Bell Labs engineers Douglas H. Ring and W. Rae Young proposed the cellular network concept in 1947; the world's first commercial 1G mobile network launched in Japan in 1979; the first 2G GSM network went live in Finland in 1991; 3G arrived in Japan in 2001; 4G launched commercially in Sweden and Norway in 2009; 5G went nationwide in South Korea in 2019; and 6G is expected to arrive by 2030. Each generational transition has created new service, distribution, and support franchise opportunities, and the current 5G transition — with its promise of ultra-fast speeds, low latency, and massive connectivity for autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and industrial IoT — is widely regarded as the most economically significant generational shift since the introduction of mobile internet. Nearly 3,000 new private cellular networks are predicted to be deployed over the next two years, compared to just 2,500 deployed over the previous four years, suggesting an accelerating pace of infrastructure build-out that creates downstream demand for configuration, support, and managed service providers. The Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise, operating in this environment with a Canadian base and a focus on wireless telecommunications services, is positioned within a market where demand growth is structural and durable — but the competitive moat and operational differentiation of the specific franchise system have not yet been demonstrated at scale, which is the central risk factor any prospective investor must weigh carefully. The ideal candidate for the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise opportunity is likely someone who combines a genuine working knowledge of wireless telecommunications technology with the entrepreneurial drive and financial discipline to build a customer base in a competitive, technically complex service category. Unlike food or retail franchises where operational expertise can be acquired quickly through standardized training, wireless telecommunications services demand franchisees who can navigate regulatory complexity, stay current on rapidly evolving technology standards including 5G and IoT protocols, and build trust with customers who are making consequential purchasing and service decisions about connectivity infrastructure. Given the Canadian domain and operational indicators, prospective investors with experience in the Canadian telecommunications market — including familiarity with CRTC regulations, Canadian spectrum policy, and the competitive dynamics of the Canadian carrier landscape — would likely have a meaningful advantage in operating a Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise successfully. The single-unit scale of the current system means that available territories are, by definition, at an early mapping stage, and investors who enter at this stage carry both the upside of territory selectivity and the risk of operating without the benefit of a large peer franchisee community from which to draw operational benchmarks, best practices, and peer support. The franchise agreement term length, renewal terms, transfer provisions, and resale conditions should all be reviewed with a franchise attorney before signing, as these structural elements of the franchise relationship have long-term implications for the investor's ability to exit the investment, pass it to a successor, or scale to additional units within an exclusive territory. Synthesizing the available evidence, the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise represents an early-stage franchise opportunity operating within one of the largest and fastest-growing industry categories in the global economy. The wireless telecommunications carriers market, valued at approximately USD 1,806.36 billion in 2024 and projected to reach USD 3,458.48 billion by 2034 at a 7.6 percent CAGR, provides a macro backdrop that almost no other franchise category can match for sheer scale and secular growth momentum. The Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise carries a PeerSense FPI Score of 38, rated Fair, which reflects the early-stage nature of the system and the limited performance transparency currently available — a score that should prompt deeper investigation rather than either dismissal or uncritical enthusiasm. The combination of a one-unit system, absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosure, and limited public information about the franchisor's operational infrastructure means that the due diligence process for this franchise must be more intensive than for a mature, multi-hundred-unit system with transparent FDD disclosures. PeerSense provides exclusive due diligence data including SBA lending history, FPI score, location maps with Google ratings, FDD financial data, and side-by-side comparison tools that allow investors to benchmark the Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise against peer concepts in the wireless telecommunications carriers category and across adjacent technology service franchise models. For investors who believe in the structural growth of the 5G and IoT connectivity markets, have relevant telecommunications industry experience, and are willing to conduct thorough independent verification of the franchisor's claims and operational capabilities, this franchise warrants serious and careful due diligence. Explore the complete Cellular Mobile Systems & Pagi franchise profile on PeerSense to access the full suite of independent franchise intelligence data.
Other franchise sites rely on marketing materials. We use real SBA lending data to show you what's actually happening.
See actual SBA loan default rates for every franchise brand. Know which brands have borrowers who repay — and which don't.
Discover which SBA lenders fund each brand, their approval volumes, and default performance. Get matched with the right lender.
Compare any franchise against its industry benchmarks. See if it outperforms or underperforms the sector average.
The PeerSense Franchise Directory is the most comprehensive data-driven franchise research tool available. With over 6,300 franchise brands scored by real SBA data and 133,000+ mapped locations, each profile includes our proprietary Franchise Performance Index (FPI), composite health scores, SBA lending data, geographic distribution, and FDD-sourced investment details.
Unlike other franchise directories, PeerSense uses real SBA loan performance data to evaluate franchise brands. Our data comes from 100+ industry sectors and 899+ SBA lenders, giving you an objective, data-backed view of franchise performance.
The FPI is a proprietary scoring system that evaluates franchise brands on a 0-100 scale based on SBA loan repayment performance, lender diversity, geographic reach, system maturity, lending velocity, and financial transparency.
Start by browsing popular categories like Restaurants, Hotels, Fitness Centers, or Child Day Care. You can also search by name, filter by investment range, and sort by FPI score to find top performers.
Once you find a franchise, explore its full profile for SBA lending history, health scores, FDD fees, and revenue data. Then check industry benchmarks to compare it against the sector, or find specialized SBA lenders who fund that brand. Looking to buy? Browse businesses for sale with data-backed valuations.
Found the right franchise? PeerSense connects you with 500+ capital sources to fund your deal. Explore financing solutions matched to franchise acquisitions.