Hollywood Tans vs Massage Envy
Hollywood Tans vs Massage Envy: Hollywood Tans costs $50K–$360K to open; Massage Envy costs $100K–$1.0M. Hollywood Tans has 110 units, Massage Envy has 430. SBA loan history: Hollywood Tans = 159 loans (20.1% default); Massage Envy = 591 loans (6.8% default). The franchise with more SBA-funded units, lower default rate, and lower royalty load is the safer financing bet, see the comparison below.
Hollywood Tans vs Massage Envy: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Data-driven differentiation pulled from FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan-level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Hollywood Tans requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($50K vs $100K for Massage Envy), a 50% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $50K for Hollywood Tans versus $51K for Massage Envy, Hollywood Tans has the lower entry fee.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Massage Envy operates 430 units to Hollywood Tans's 110, roughly 4× the system size. Hollywood Tans has been operating 32 years (founded 1994) versus 24 for Massage Envy (founded 2002), a 8-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
Massage Envy has the deeper SBA lending track record with 591 historical 7(a) approvals versus 159 for Hollywood Tans. Hollywood Tans's peak SBA year was 2001 (39 loans); Massage Envy's peak was 2008 (73 loans). Massage Envy's more recent peak generally indicates fresher lender appetite. Geographically, Hollywood Tans concentrates in NJ (42 SBA-funded units) while Massage Envy leads in CA (83). Pick the brand whose strongest state matches yours for warmest lender introductions. Average SBA loan size on funded Hollywood Tans deals is $213K vs $423K for Massage Envy, useful as a sizing anchor when modeling your own unit.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 20.1% for Hollywood Tans and 6.8% for Massage Envy, Massage Envy has the cleaner historical loss profile by 13.3 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 24 (Fair) for Hollywood Tans and 60 (Moderate) for Massage Envy, giving Massage Envy the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 24/100 | 60/100 |
Health Tier | Limited | Moderate |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 159 | 591 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 20.1% | 6.8% |
Peer Tier | major | major |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $50K – $360K | $100K – $1.0M |
Franchise Fee | $50K | $51K |
Royalty Rate | N/A | 6% |
Ad Fund | N/A | 2% |
Liquid Capital | $100K | N/A |
Net Worth Required | $300K | $500K |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 110 | 430 |
Franchised Units | 110 | 430 |
Company-Owned | – | – |
Term Length | N/A | 10 yrs |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1994 | 2002 |
Franchising Since | N/A | 1960 |
Years Franchising | N/A | 66 yrs |
Headquarters | ASTON (ASTON MILLS), PA | SANTA ROSA, CA |
Category | Other Personal Care Services | Other Personal Care Services |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | 2025 |
Which Is Better, Hollywood Tans or Massage Envy?
Lower upfront capital required
Hollywood Tans
Hollywood Tans: $50K starting · Massage Envy: $100K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Massage Envy
Hollywood Tans: 159 SBA loans · Massage Envy: 591 SBA loans
Lower historical default rate
Massage Envy
Hollywood Tans: 20.1% · Massage Envy: 6.8%
Larger system & brand presence
Massage Envy
Hollywood Tans: 110 units · Massage Envy: 430 units
More lender financing options
Massage Envy
Hollywood Tans: 25 unique lenders · Massage Envy: 120 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Hollywood Tans or Massage Envy?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Hollywood Tans vs Massage Envy: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Hollywood Tans and Massage Envy is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $50K to $1.0M.
Both brands have active SBA lending histories, Hollywood Tans with 159 SBA loans and Massage Envy with 591. This means proven lender acceptance and established underwriting paths for franchise buyers.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Hollywood Tans vs Massage Envy, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Hollywood Tans or Massage Envy?
How much does a Hollywood Tans franchise cost compared to Massage Envy?
Can I finance Hollywood Tans or Massage Envy with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Hollywood Tans or Massage Envy?
Financing a franchise? Get matched to an SBA lender.
Tell us which brand and your budget. We route you to lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): Response within 24–48 hours. No obligation.