Window World vs Wood Re New
Window World vs Wood Re New: Window World costs $265K to $456K to open; Wood Re New costs $38K to $150K. Window World has 32 units, Wood Re New has 7. SBA loan history: Window World = 29 loans (0.0% default); Wood Re New = 8 loans (12.5% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
Window World vs Wood Re New: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Wood Re New requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($38K vs $265K for Window World), a 598% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $45K for Window World versus $25K for Wood Re New, Wood Re New has the lower entry fee. Ongoing royalty load is 12% for Window World and 6% for Wood Re New, giving Wood Re New the lighter per-unit drag on operating income.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Window World operates 32 units to Wood Re New's 7, roughly 5× the system size. Wood Re New has been operating 33 years (founded 1993) versus 31 for Window World (founded 1995), a 2-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
Window World has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 29 7(a) approvals compared with 8 for Wood Re New.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 0.0% for Window World and 12.5% for Wood Re New, Window World has the cleaner SBA loss record by 12.5 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 63 (Moderate) for Window World and 27 (Fair) for Wood Re New, giving Window World the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 63/100 | 27/100 |
Health Tier | Moderate | Limited |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 29 | 8 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 0.0% | 12.5% |
Peer Tier | established | emerging |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $265K to $456K | $38K to $150K |
Franchise Fee | $45K | $25K |
Royalty Rate | 12% | 6% |
Ad Fund | N/A | N/A |
Liquid Capital | N/A | N/A |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 32 | 7 |
Franchised Units | 32 | 7 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | 10 yrs | N/A |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1995 | 1993 |
Franchising Since | 2025 | N/A |
Years Franchising | 1 yrs | N/A |
Headquarters | North Wilkesboro, NC | JOPLIN, MO |
Category | Finish Carpentry Contractors | Finish Carpentry Contractors |
Website | ||
FDD Year | 2025 | N/A |
Which Is Better, Window World or Wood Re New?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
Window World: $265K starting · Wood Re New: $38K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Window World
Window World: 29 SBA loans · Wood Re New: 8 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
Window World
Window World: 0.0% · Wood Re New: 12.5%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
Window World: 32 units · Wood Re New: 7 units
Lower ongoing royalty load
Wood Re New
Window World: 12% · Wood Re New: 6%
More lender financing options
Window World
Window World: 21 unique lenders · Wood Re New: 7 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Window World or Wood Re New?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Window World vs Wood Re New: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Window World and Wood Re New is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $38K to $456K.
Window World has 29 SBA loans on record and Wood Re New has 8. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Window World vs Wood Re New, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Window World or Wood Re New?
How much does a Window World franchise cost compared to Wood Re New?
Can I finance Window World or Wood Re New with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Window World or Wood Re New?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman