Skip to main content
✦Prime Rate:7.00%✦Fed Funds:3.75%✦5 Yr Treasury:4.78%↓✦10 Yr Treasury:4.98%↓✦30 Yr Treasury:5.32%↓✦30 Yr Mortgage:7.24%·Updated Oct 29, 2026✦Prime Rate:7.00%✦Fed Funds:3.75%✦5 Yr Treasury:4.78%↓✦10 Yr Treasury:4.98%↓✦30 Yr Treasury:5.32%↓✦30 Yr Mortgage:7.24%·Updated Oct 29, 2026
Rates
Side by Side Comparison

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore vs Vision Source

Quick Answer

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore vs Vision Source: Sterling Opticalsite For Sore costs $170K to $962K to open; Vision Source costs $100K to $450K. Sterling Opticalsite For Sore has 7 units, Vision Source has 55. SBA loan history: Sterling Opticalsite For Sore = 9 loans (0.0% default); Vision Source = 56 loans (1.8% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore vs Vision Source: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis

Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.

Capital Intensity

Vision Source requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($100K vs $170K for Sterling Opticalsite For Sore), a 70% spread.

System Scale & Tenure

On scale, Vision Source operates 55 units to Sterling Opticalsite For Sore's 7, roughly 8× the system size. Vision Source has been operating 35 years (founded 1991) versus 17 for Sterling Opticalsite For Sore (founded 2009), a 18-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.

SBA Lending Profile

Vision Source has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 56 7(a) approvals compared with 9 for Sterling Opticalsite For Sore.

Risk Signal

SBA default rates are 0.0% for Sterling Opticalsite For Sore and 1.8% for Vision Source, Sterling Opticalsite For Sore has the cleaner SBA loss record by 1.8 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 52 (Moderate) for Sterling Opticalsite For Sore and 62 (Moderate) for Vision Source, giving Vision Source the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.

S
Sterling Opticalsite For Sore

Offices of Optometrists

52
Vision Source
Vision Source

Offices of Optometrists

62 11W

Health & Performance

FPI Score
52/100
62/100
Health Tier
Moderate
Moderate
Confidence
N/A
N/A
Lending Trend
Declining
Declining

SBA Lending

SBA Loans
9
56
SBA Volume
–
–
Default Rate
0.0%
1.8%
Peer Tier
emerging
established

Investment & Costs

Total Investment
$170K to $962K
$100K to $450K
Franchise Fee
$10K
N/A
Royalty Rate
N/A
2.5%
Ad Fund
N/A
N/A
Liquid Capital
N/A
N/A
Net Worth Required
N/A
N/A

Financial Performance (Item 19)

Item 19 Status
Not Disclosed
Not Disclosed

System Size & Operations

Total Units
7
55
Franchised Units
7
55
Company Owned
–
–
Term Length
N/A
5 yrs

Brand Information

Year Founded
2009
1991
Franchising Since
N/A
1996
Years Franchising
N/A
30 yrs
Headquarters
POTTSTOWN, PA
Kingwood, Houston
Category
Offices of Optometrists
Offices of Optometrists
Website
FDD Year
2023
2025

Which Is Better, Sterling Opticalsite For Sore or Vision Source?

Lower upfront capital required

Vision Source

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore: $170K starting · Vision Source: $100K starting

More SBA lender confidence

Vision Source

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore: 9 SBA loans · Vision Source: 56 SBA loans

Lower SBA default rate

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore: 0.0% · Vision Source: 1.8%

Larger system & brand presence

Vision Source

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore: 7 units · Vision Source: 55 units

More lender financing options

Vision Source

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore: 3 unique lenders · Vision Source: 49 unique lenders

Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.

Franchise Financing

Need Funding for Sterling Opticalsite For Sore or Vision Source?

PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.

500+

SBA Lenders & Capital Sources

$0

Retainers or Consulting Fees

SBA 7(a)

10% Down Franchise Loans

About These Franchises

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore

No description available.

Vision Source

No description available.

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore vs Vision Source: Franchise Funding Comparison

Comparing Sterling Opticalsite For Sore and Vision Source is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $100K to $962K.

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore has 9 SBA loans on record and Vision Source has 56. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.

SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.

Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.

Sterling Opticalsite For Sore vs Vision Source, Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better franchise investment, Sterling Opticalsite For Sore or Vision Source?
Compare Sterling Opticalsite For Sore vs Vision Source franchise costs, FDD data, royalty rates, unit counts, and SBA lending history side by side above. The best franchise depends on your capital, market, and risk tolerance, not a single ranking. Use the decision matrix above to see which brand wins on each financing dimension.
How much does a Sterling Opticalsite For Sore franchise cost compared to Vision Source?
Sterling Opticalsite For Sore requires $170K to $962K in total initial investment with a $10K franchise fee. Vision Source requires $100K to $450K with a N/A franchise fee. All numbers come from official Franchise Disclosure Document filings.
Can I finance Sterling Opticalsite For Sore or Vision Source with an SBA loan?
Both brands appear on the SBA Franchise Directory and have funded SBA 7(a) loans: Sterling Opticalsite For Sore has 9 SBA loans on record; Vision Source has 56. SBA 7(a) is the most common franchise financing vehicle, offering up to $5M with 10% down. PeerSense routes your deal to lenders who have already approved the brand.
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Sterling Opticalsite For Sore or Vision Source?
Sterling Opticalsite For Sore: 0.0% SBA default rate. Vision Source: 1.8% SBA default rate. Lower default rates mean lenders quote tighter rates and underwrite faster.

Talk to PeerSense

Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.

Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.

How big is your deal?
Where are you in the deal?
Equity or down payment ready
Credit score
Timeline to close
SBA already on the books?
What best describes your company
Liquid funds available outside this deal

Referral fee realized at closing · Or call (317) 452 6990

Page Review

Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense

  • PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
  • Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
  • He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
  • His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
  • In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page

Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman