Scorchers vs Tastings
Scorchers vs Tastings: Scorchers costs $19K to $307K to open; Tastings costs $25K to $547K. Scorchers has 4 units, Tastings has 2. SBA loan history: Scorchers = 8 loans (50.0% default); Tastings = 7 loans (57.1% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
Scorchers vs Tastings: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Scorchers requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($19K vs $25K for Tastings), a 24% spread.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Scorchers operates 4 units to Tastings's 2.
SBA Lending Profile
Scorchers has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 8 7(a) approvals compared with 7 for Tastings. Scorchers's peak SBA year was 2004 (3 loans); Tastings's peak was 2008 (5 loans). Tastings's more recent peak generally indicates fresher lender appetite. Scorchers has the most SBA funded units in OH, with 5. Tastings leads in TX, with 4. Borrowers should pick the brand whose strongest SBA state matches their own state for warmer lender introductions. Average SBA loan size on funded Scorchers deals is $146K vs $274K for Tastings, useful as a sizing anchor when modeling your own unit.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 50.0% for Scorchers and 57.1% for Tastings, Scorchers has the cleaner SBA loss record by 7.1 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 20 (Fair) for Scorchers and 20 (Fair) for Tastings.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 20/100 | 20/100 |
Health Tier | Limited | Limited |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 8 | 7 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 50.0% | 57.1% |
Peer Tier | emerging | emerging |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $19K to $307K | $25K to $547K |
Franchise Fee | N/A | $25K |
Royalty Rate | N/A | 6% |
Ad Fund | N/A | N/A |
Liquid Capital | N/A | N/A |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 4 | 2 |
Franchised Units | 4 | 2 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | N/A | N/A |
Brand Information
Year Founded | N/A | 2002 |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | AKRON, OH | ARLINGTON, TX |
Category | Drinking Places | Drinking Places |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | N/A |
Which Is Better, Scorchers or Tastings?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
Scorchers: $19K starting · Tastings: $25K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Scorchers
Scorchers: 8 SBA loans · Tastings: 7 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
Scorchers
Scorchers: 50.0% · Tastings: 57.1%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
Scorchers: 4 units · Tastings: 2 units
More lender financing options
Scorchers
Scorchers: 4 unique lenders · Tastings: 2 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Scorchers or Tastings?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Scorchers vs Tastings: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Scorchers and Tastings is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $19K to $547K.
Scorchers has 8 SBA loans on record and Tastings has 7. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Scorchers vs Tastings, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Scorchers or Tastings?
How much does a Scorchers franchise cost compared to Tastings?
Can I finance Scorchers or Tastings with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Scorchers or Tastings?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman