Turbo Tint vs Novus Novus Glass
Turbo Tint vs Novus Novus Glass: Turbo Tint costs $296K to $415K to open; Novus Novus Glass costs $70K to $285K. Turbo Tint has 12 units, Novus Novus Glass has 9. SBA loan history: Turbo Tint = 16 loans (0.0% default); Novus Novus Glass = 9 loans (0.0% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
Turbo Tint vs Novus Novus Glass: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Novus Novus Glass requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($70K vs $296K for Turbo Tint), a 325% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $400K for Turbo Tint versus $11K for Novus Novus Glass, Novus Novus Glass has the lower entry fee. Ongoing royalty load is 7% for Turbo Tint and 6% for Novus Novus Glass, giving Novus Novus Glass the lighter per-unit drag on operating income.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Turbo Tint operates 12 units to Novus Novus Glass's 9.
SBA Lending Profile
Turbo Tint has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 16 7(a) approvals compared with 9 for Novus Novus Glass.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 0.0% for Turbo Tint and 0.0% for Novus Novus Glass. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 81 (Excellent) for Turbo Tint and 55 (Moderate) for Novus Novus Glass, giving Turbo Tint the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 81/100 | 55/100 |
Health Tier | Excellent | Moderate |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Surging | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 16 | 9 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Peer Tier | growing | emerging |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $296K to $415K | $70K to $285K |
Franchise Fee | $400K | $11K |
Royalty Rate | 7% | 6% |
Ad Fund | 1% | 2% |
Liquid Capital | $75K | N/A |
Net Worth Required | $400K | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 12 | 9 |
Franchised Units | 12 | 9 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | N/A | 10 yrs |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 2005 | N/A |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | Midlothian, IL | N/A |
Category | Automotive Glass Replacement Shops | Automotive Glass Replacement Shops |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | 2025 |
Which Is Better, Turbo Tint or Novus Novus Glass?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
Turbo Tint: $296K starting · Novus Novus Glass: $70K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Turbo Tint
Turbo Tint: 16 SBA loans · Novus Novus Glass: 9 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
Tie
Turbo Tint: 0.0% · Novus Novus Glass: 0.0%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
Turbo Tint: 12 units · Novus Novus Glass: 9 units
Lower ongoing royalty load
Novus Novus Glass
Turbo Tint: 7% · Novus Novus Glass: 6%
More lender financing options
Novus Novus Glass
Turbo Tint: 4 unique lenders · Novus Novus Glass: 7 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Turbo Tint or Novus Novus Glass?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Turbo Tint vs Novus Novus Glass: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Turbo Tint and Novus Novus Glass is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $70K to $415K.
Turbo Tint has 16 SBA loans on record and Novus Novus Glass has 9. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Turbo Tint vs Novus Novus Glass, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Turbo Tint or Novus Novus Glass?
How much does a Turbo Tint franchise cost compared to Novus Novus Glass?
Can I finance Turbo Tint or Novus Novus Glass with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Turbo Tint or Novus Novus Glass?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman