Modern Acupuncture vs Squeeze
Modern Acupuncture vs Squeeze: Modern Acupuncture costs $111K–$403K to open; Squeeze costs $32K–$966K. Modern Acupuncture has 21 units, Squeeze has 16. SBA loan history: Modern Acupuncture = 25 loans (12.0% default); Squeeze = 27 loans (0.0% default). The franchise with more SBA-funded units, lower default rate, and lower royalty load is the safer financing bet, see the comparison below.
Modern Acupuncture vs Squeeze: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Data-driven differentiation pulled from FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan-level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Squeeze requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($32K vs $111K for Modern Acupuncture), a 247% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $40K for Modern Acupuncture versus $60K for Squeeze, Modern Acupuncture has the lower entry fee. Ongoing royalty load is 7% for Modern Acupuncture and 6% for Squeeze, giving Squeeze the lighter per-unit drag on operating income.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Modern Acupuncture operates 21 units to Squeeze's 16. Modern Acupuncture has been operating 10 years (founded 2016) versus 7 for Squeeze (founded 2019), a 3-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
Squeeze has the deeper SBA lending track record with 27 historical 7(a) approvals versus 25 for Modern Acupuncture. Modern Acupuncture's peak SBA year was 2018 (14 loans); Squeeze's peak was 2024 (15 loans). Squeeze's more recent peak generally indicates fresher lender appetite. Both systems concentrate the most SBA-funded units in CA. Borrowers in that state will find the deepest lender familiarity with either brand. Average SBA loan size on funded Modern Acupuncture deals is $296K vs $480K for Squeeze, useful as a sizing anchor when modeling your own unit.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 12.0% for Modern Acupuncture and 0.0% for Squeeze, Squeeze has the cleaner historical loss profile by 12.0 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 40 (Fair) for Modern Acupuncture and 69 (Strong) for Squeeze, giving Squeeze the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 40/100 | 69/100 |
Health Tier | Fair | Strong |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | N/A |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 25 | 27 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 12.0% | 0.0% |
Peer Tier | established | established |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $111K – $403K | $32K – $966K |
Franchise Fee | $40K | $60K |
Royalty Rate | 7% | 6% |
Ad Fund | 2% | N/A |
Liquid Capital | N/A | N/A |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 21 | 16 |
Franchised Units | 21 | 16 |
Company-Owned | – | – |
Term Length | 10 yrs | N/A |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | SAN DIEGO, CA | SAN MATEO, CA |
Category | Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners | Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | 2025 |
Which Is Better, Modern Acupuncture or Squeeze?
Lower upfront capital required
Squeeze
Modern Acupuncture: $111K starting · Squeeze: $32K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Squeeze
Modern Acupuncture: 25 SBA loans · Squeeze: 27 SBA loans
Lower historical default rate
Squeeze
Modern Acupuncture: 12.0% · Squeeze: 0.0%
Larger system & brand presence
Modern Acupuncture
Modern Acupuncture: 21 units · Squeeze: 16 units
Lower ongoing royalty load
Squeeze
Modern Acupuncture: 7% · Squeeze: 6%
More lender financing options
Modern Acupuncture
Modern Acupuncture: 8 unique lenders · Squeeze: 6 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Modern Acupuncture or Squeeze?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Modern Acupuncture vs Squeeze: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Modern Acupuncture and Squeeze is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $32K to $966K.
Both brands have active SBA lending histories, Modern Acupuncture with 25 SBA loans and Squeeze with 27. This means proven lender acceptance and established underwriting paths for franchise buyers.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Modern Acupuncture vs Squeeze, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Modern Acupuncture or Squeeze?
How much does a Modern Acupuncture franchise cost compared to Squeeze?
Can I finance Modern Acupuncture or Squeeze with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Modern Acupuncture or Squeeze?
Financing a franchise? Get matched to an SBA lender.
Tell us which brand and your budget. We route you to lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): Response within 24–48 hours. No obligation.