Hollywood Tans vs Spavia Day Spa
Hollywood Tans vs Spavia Day Spa: Hollywood Tans costs $50K to $360K to open; Spavia Day Spa costs $496K to $698K. Hollywood Tans has 110 units, Spavia Day Spa has 39. SBA loan history: Hollywood Tans = 159 loans (20.1% default); Spavia Day Spa = 50 loans (4.0% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
Hollywood Tans vs Spavia Day Spa: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Hollywood Tans requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($50K vs $496K for Spavia Day Spa), a 90% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $50K for Hollywood Tans versus $60K for Spavia Day Spa, Hollywood Tans has the lower entry fee.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Hollywood Tans operates 110 units to Spavia Day Spa's 39, roughly 3× the system size. Hollywood Tans has been operating 32 years (founded 1994) versus 21 for Spavia Day Spa (founded 2005), a 11-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
Hollywood Tans has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 159 7(a) approvals compared with 50 for Spavia Day Spa.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 20.1% for Hollywood Tans and 4.0% for Spavia Day Spa, Spavia Day Spa has the cleaner SBA loss record by 16.1 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 24 (Fair) for Hollywood Tans and 51 (Moderate) for Spavia Day Spa, giving Spavia Day Spa the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 24/100 | 51/100 |
Health Tier | Limited | Moderate |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 159 | 50 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 20.1% | 4.0% |
Peer Tier | major | established |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $50K to $360K | $496K to $698K |
Franchise Fee | $50K | $60K |
Royalty Rate | N/A | 6% |
Ad Fund | N/A | 1% |
Liquid Capital | $100K | N/A |
Net Worth Required | $300K | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 110 | 39 |
Franchised Units | 110 | 39 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | N/A | 1 yrs |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1994 | 2005 |
Franchising Since | N/A | 2020 |
Years Franchising | N/A | 6 yrs |
Headquarters | ASTON (ASTON MILLS), PA | Denver, CO |
Category | Other Personal Care Services | Other Personal Care Services |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | 2025 |
Which Is Better, Hollywood Tans or Spavia Day Spa?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
Hollywood Tans: $50K starting · Spavia Day Spa: $496K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Hollywood Tans
Hollywood Tans: 159 SBA loans · Spavia Day Spa: 50 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
Spavia Day Spa
Hollywood Tans: 20.1% · Spavia Day Spa: 4.0%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
Hollywood Tans: 110 units · Spavia Day Spa: 39 units
More lender financing options
Hollywood Tans
Hollywood Tans: 25 unique lenders · Spavia Day Spa: 20 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Hollywood Tans or Spavia Day Spa?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Hollywood Tans vs Spavia Day Spa: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Hollywood Tans and Spavia Day Spa is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $50K to $698K.
Hollywood Tans has 159 SBA loans on record and Spavia Day Spa has 50. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Hollywood Tans vs Spavia Day Spa, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Hollywood Tans or Spavia Day Spa?
How much does a Hollywood Tans franchise cost compared to Spavia Day Spa?
Can I finance Hollywood Tans or Spavia Day Spa with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Hollywood Tans or Spavia Day Spa?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman