GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING vs Sports Section (The)
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING vs Sports Section (The): GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING costs $218K to $265K to open; Sports Section (The) costs $27K to $95K. GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has 24 units, Sports Section (The) has 7. SBA loan history: GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING = 25 loans (24.0% default); Sports Section (The) = 7 loans (0.0% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING vs Sports Section (The): Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Sports Section (The) requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($27K vs $218K for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING), a 697% spread.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING operates 24 units to Sports Section (The)'s 7, roughly 3× the system size.
SBA Lending Profile
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 25 7(a) approvals compared with 7 for Sports Section (The).
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 24.0% for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING and 0.0% for Sports Section (The), Sports Section (The) has the cleaner SBA loss record by 24.0 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 31 (Fair) for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING and 55 (Moderate) for Sports Section (The), giving Sports Section (The) the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 31/100 | 55/100 |
Health Tier | Limited | Moderate |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | N/A |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 25 | 7 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 24.0% | 0.0% |
Peer Tier | established | emerging |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $218K to $265K | $27K to $95K |
Franchise Fee | $30K | N/A |
Royalty Rate | 3% | N/A |
Ad Fund | N/A | N/A |
Liquid Capital | N/A | N/A |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 24 | 7 |
Franchised Units | 24 | 7 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | 10 yrs | N/A |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1988 | N/A |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | Oklahoma City, OK | MA |
Category | Photography Studios, Portrait | Photography Studios, Portrait |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | N/A |
Which Is Better, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING or Sports Section (The)?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: $218K starting · Sports Section (The): $27K starting
More SBA lender confidence
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 25 SBA loans · Sports Section (The): 7 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
Sports Section (The)
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 24.0% · Sports Section (The): 0.0%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 24 units · Sports Section (The): 7 units
More lender financing options
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 15 unique lenders · Sports Section (The): 6 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING or Sports Section (The)?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING vs Sports Section (The): Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING and Sports Section (The) is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $27K to $265K.
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has 25 SBA loans on record and Sports Section (The) has 7. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING vs Sports Section (The), Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING or Sports Section (The)?
How much does a GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING franchise cost compared to Sports Section (The)?
Can I finance GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING or Sports Section (The) with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING or Sports Section (The)?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman