Fire+Ice vs Kidville
Fire+Ice vs Kidville: Fire+Ice costs $133K to $340K to open; Kidville costs $198K to $263K. Fire+Ice has 7 units, Kidville has 12. SBA loan history: Fire+Ice = 7 loans (0.0% default); Kidville = 14 loans (7.1% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
Fire+Ice vs Kidville: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Fire+Ice requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($133K vs $198K for Kidville), a 33% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $45K for Fire+Ice versus $10K for Kidville, Kidville has the lower entry fee. Ongoing royalty load is 5% for Fire+Ice and 7% for Kidville, giving Fire+Ice the lighter per-unit drag on operating income.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Kidville operates 12 units to Fire+Ice's 7. Fire+Ice has been operating 29 years (founded 1997) versus 16 for Kidville (founded 2010), a 13-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
Kidville has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 14 7(a) approvals compared with 7 for Fire+Ice.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 0.0% for Fire+Ice and 7.1% for Kidville, Fire+Ice has the cleaner SBA loss record by 7.1 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 42 (Fair) for Fire+Ice and 38 (Fair) for Kidville, giving Fire+Ice the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 42/100 | 38/100 |
Health Tier | Fair | Fair |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 7 | 14 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 0.0% | 7.1% |
Peer Tier | emerging | growing |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $133K to $340K | $198K to $263K |
Franchise Fee | $45K | $10K |
Royalty Rate | 5% | 7% |
Ad Fund | 2% | 3% |
Liquid Capital | N/A | N/A |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 7 | 12 |
Franchised Units | 7 | 12 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | 10 yrs | 10 yrs |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1997 | 2010 |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | Rancho Cordova, CA | New York, NY |
Category | Educational Support Services | Educational Support Services |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | N/A |
Which Is Better, Fire+Ice or Kidville?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
Fire+Ice: $133K starting · Kidville: $198K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Kidville
Fire+Ice: 7 SBA loans · Kidville: 14 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
Fire+Ice
Fire+Ice: 0.0% · Kidville: 7.1%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
Fire+Ice: 7 units · Kidville: 12 units
Lower ongoing royalty load
Fire+Ice
Fire+Ice: 5% · Kidville: 7%
More lender financing options
Fire+Ice
Fire+Ice: 7 unique lenders · Kidville: 4 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Fire+Ice or Kidville?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Fire+Ice vs Kidville: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Fire+Ice and Kidville is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $133K to $340K.
Fire+Ice has 7 SBA loans on record and Kidville has 14. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Fire+Ice vs Kidville, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Fire+Ice or Kidville?
How much does a Fire+Ice franchise cost compared to Kidville?
Can I finance Fire+Ice or Kidville with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Fire+Ice or Kidville?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman