Fibrenew vs Maaco
Fibrenew vs Maaco: Fibrenew costs $66K–$150K to open; Maaco costs $100K–$1.4M. Fibrenew has 47 units, Maaco has 467. SBA loan history: Fibrenew = 54 loans (7.4% default); Maaco = 608 loans (12.5% default). The franchise with more SBA-funded units, lower default rate, and lower royalty load is the safer financing bet, see the comparison below.
Fibrenew vs Maaco: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Data-driven differentiation pulled from FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan-level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Fibrenew requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($66K vs $100K for Maaco), a 35% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $68K for Fibrenew versus $47K for Maaco, Maaco has the lower entry fee. Ongoing royalty load is 8% for Fibrenew and 4% for Maaco, giving Maaco the lighter per-unit drag on operating income.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, Maaco operates 467 units to Fibrenew's 47, roughly 10× the system size. Maaco has been operating 54 years (founded 1972) versus 41 for Fibrenew (founded 1985), a 13-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
Maaco has the deeper SBA lending track record with 608 historical 7(a) approvals versus 54 for Fibrenew. Fibrenew's peak SBA year was 2018 (8 loans); Maaco's peak was 1997 (46 loans). Fibrenew's more recent peak generally indicates fresher lender appetite. Geographically, Fibrenew concentrates in IN (8 SBA-funded units) while Maaco leads in CA (69). Pick the brand whose strongest state matches yours for warmest lender introductions. Average SBA loan size on funded Fibrenew deals is $120K vs $370K for Maaco, useful as a sizing anchor when modeling your own unit.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 7.4% for Fibrenew and 12.5% for Maaco, Fibrenew has the cleaner historical loss profile by 5.1 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 56 (Moderate) for Fibrenew and 52 (Moderate) for Maaco, giving Fibrenew the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 56/100 | 52/100 |
Health Tier | Moderate | Moderate |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 54 | 608 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 7.4% | 12.5% |
Peer Tier | established | major |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $66K – $150K | $100K – $1.4M |
Franchise Fee | $68K | $47K |
Royalty Rate | 8% | 4% |
Ad Fund | 5% | N/A |
Liquid Capital | N/A | $150K |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 47 | 467 |
Franchised Units | 47 | 467 |
Company-Owned | – | – |
Term Length | 10 yrs | N/A |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1985 | 1972 |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | CROWN POINT, IN | LAKEWOOD, NJ |
Category | Automotive Body, Paint, | Automotive Body, Paint, |
Website | ||
FDD Year | 2026 | N/A |
Which Is Better, Fibrenew or Maaco?
Lower upfront capital required
Fibrenew
Fibrenew: $66K starting · Maaco: $100K starting
More SBA lender confidence
Maaco
Fibrenew: 54 SBA loans · Maaco: 608 SBA loans
Lower historical default rate
Fibrenew
Fibrenew: 7.4% · Maaco: 12.5%
Larger system & brand presence
Maaco
Fibrenew: 47 units · Maaco: 467 units
Lower ongoing royalty load
Maaco
Fibrenew: 8% · Maaco: 4%
More lender financing options
Maaco
Fibrenew: 16 unique lenders · Maaco: 188 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Fibrenew or Maaco?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Fibrenew vs Maaco: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Fibrenew and Maaco is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $66K to $1.4M.
Both brands have active SBA lending histories, Fibrenew with 54 SBA loans and Maaco with 608. This means proven lender acceptance and established underwriting paths for franchise buyers.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Fibrenew vs Maaco, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Fibrenew or Maaco?
How much does a Fibrenew franchise cost compared to Maaco?
Can I finance Fibrenew or Maaco with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Fibrenew or Maaco?
Financing a franchise? Get matched to an SBA lender.
Tell us which brand and your budget. We route you to lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): Response within 24–48 hours. No obligation.