Clix vs GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING
Clix vs GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: Clix costs $175K to $296K to open; GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING costs $218K to $265K. Clix has 4 units, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has 24. SBA loan history: Clix = 9 loans (55.6% default); GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING = 25 loans (24.0% default). The franchise with more SBA funded units, a lower SBA default rate, and a lower royalty load is the safer financing bet; see the comparison below.
Clix vs GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: Capital, Scale & Lending Analysis
Analysis based on FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan level data. Each pairing reflects a unique combination of capital intensity, system scale, and financing path.
Capital Intensity
Clix requires the lower minimum capital commitment ($175K vs $218K for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING), a 20% spread. Initial franchise fees come in at $21K for Clix versus $30K for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING, Clix has the lower entry fee.
System Scale & Tenure
On scale, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING operates 24 units to Clix's 4, roughly 6× the system size. GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has been operating 38 years (founded 1988) versus 27 for Clix (founded 1999), a 11-year tenure gap that affects unit-economics maturity and FDD revision history.
SBA Lending Profile
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has the deeper SBA lending track record, with 25 7(a) approvals compared with 9 for Clix.
Risk Signal
SBA default rates are 55.6% for Clix and 24.0% for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING, GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has the cleaner SBA loss record by 31.6 points. PeerSense FPI scores come in at 17 (Fair) for Clix and 31 (Fair) for GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING, giving GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING the stronger composite signal across SBA performance, lender appetite, and operational consistency.
Health & Performance
FPI Score | 17/100 | 31/100 |
Health Tier | Limited | Limited |
Confidence | N/A | N/A |
Lending Trend | Declining | Declining |
SBA Lending
SBA Loans | 9 | 25 |
SBA Volume | – | – |
Default Rate | 55.6% | 24.0% |
Peer Tier | emerging | established |
Investment & Costs
Total Investment | $175K to $296K | $218K to $265K |
Franchise Fee | $21K | $30K |
Royalty Rate | N/A | 3% |
Ad Fund | 2% | N/A |
Liquid Capital | N/A | N/A |
Net Worth Required | N/A | N/A |
Financial Performance (Item 19)
Item 19 Status | Not Disclosed | Not Disclosed |
System Size & Operations
Total Units | 4 | 24 |
Franchised Units | 4 | 24 |
Company Owned | – | – |
Term Length | 10 yrs | 10 yrs |
Brand Information
Year Founded | 1999 | 1988 |
Franchising Since | N/A | N/A |
Years Franchising | N/A | N/A |
Headquarters | IL | Oklahoma City, OK |
Category | Photography Studios, Portrait | Photography Studios, Portrait |
Website | ||
FDD Year | N/A | N/A |
Which Is Better, Clix or GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING?
Lower upfront capital required
Tie
Clix: $175K starting · GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: $218K starting
More SBA lender confidence
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING
Clix: 9 SBA loans · GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 25 SBA loans
Lower SBA default rate
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING
Clix: 55.6% · GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 24.0%
Larger system & brand presence
Tie
Clix: 4 units · GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 24 units
More lender financing options
GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING
Clix: 4 unique lenders · GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: 15 unique lenders
Decision matrix uses publicly disclosed FDD and SBA loan data. Not a recommendation. Your best franchise depends on capital, market, operating capacity, and risk tolerance.
Need Funding for Clix or GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING?
PeerSense connects you with 500+ SBA lenders and capital sources. Our referral fee is established upfront and paid at closing.
SBA Lenders & Capital Sources
Retainers or Consulting Fees
10% Down Franchise Loans
About These Franchises
Clix vs GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING: Franchise Funding Comparison
Comparing Clix and GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING is about more than brand preference. It's about which franchise fits your financial profile and funding strategy. Investment ranges from $175K to $296K.
Clix has 9 SBA loans on record and GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING has 25. Those totals are cumulative history rather than a measure of current appetite. Recent lending activity is trending down for at least one of these brands, so current lender appetite has to be checked deal by deal rather than assumed from the totals.
SBA 7(a) loans are the most common franchise funding vehicle, offering up to $5M with as little as 10% down. PeerSense connects franchise buyers with the specific lenders who have approved loans for these brands, not generic referrals, but lenders with actual franchise lending track records.
Data sourced from SBA loan records, Franchise Disclosure Documents, and public filings. Updated regularly. Not financial advice, consult with a lending professional before making investment decisions.
Clix vs GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING, Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better franchise investment, Clix or GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING?
How much does a Clix franchise cost compared to GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING?
Can I finance Clix or GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING with an SBA loan?
Which has a lower SBA default rate, Clix or GLAMOUR SHOTS LICENSING?
Talk to PeerSense
Tell us which brand and your budget. We source capital from lenders who have already funded deals in these systems.
Franchise / SBA 7(a): The desk will reach out. No obligation.
Page Review
Reviewed by Edward L. Freeman, Founder and Managing Director, PeerSense
- PeerSense is a capital advisory firm that places commercial financing with direct capital sources; the capital source sets final terms.
- Edward L. Freeman founded PeerSense in January 2020.
- He is a Registered Franchise Consultant with Business Alliance, Inc., a credential issued in March 2022, and worked as a franchise consultant there from March 2022 to May 2023.
- His recorded experience includes a $22 million SBA construction loan, with about $16 million funded on the deal.
- In the 12 months through September 30, 2026, PeerSense tracked 912 publicly announced financings with a disclosed size of $361.32 billion. PeerSense Capital Data Report · Methodology page
Last reviewed LinkedIn profileAbout Edward Freeman