Tans & Company
4 locations
The total investment to open a Tans & Company franchise ranges from $386,430 - $774,600. The initial franchise fee is $49,500. Ongoing royalties are 8% plus a 1% advertising fee. Tans & Company currently operates 4 locations (4 franchised). PeerSense FPI health score: 53/100. Data sourced from the 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document.
$386,430 - $774,600
$49,500
4
4 franchised
Proprietary PeerSense metric
ModerateActive capital sources verified for Tans & Company financing
SBA
7(a) Eligible
21d
Avg Funding
P+2.25%
Best Rate
No retainers · Referral fee at closing
FPI Score Breakdown
Emerging (3-9 loans)
SBA Lending Performance
SBA Default Rate
0.0%
0 of 4 loans charged off
SBA Loans
4
Total Volume
$1.0M
Active Lenders
3
States
2
Top SBA Lenders for Tans & Company
What is the Tans & Company franchise?
The landscape of franchise investment is complex, often presenting prospective owners with the critical challenge of accurately identifying a brand’s core business and its true market potential, especially when a name like "Tans" might evoke multiple industry associations. For astute investors navigating the dynamic franchise market, understanding the specific classification of the "Tans franchise" within the Sports and Recreation Instruction sector, rather than the more commonly associated tanning salon industry, is the foundational problem this analysis addresses. This particular "Tans franchise," headquartered in ARNOLD, MO, operates on a notably small scale, with just 3 total units and 4 franchised units, indicating a brand either in its very nascent stages or pursuing a highly specialized, perhaps even boutique, operational model, with zero company-owned locations. While the specific founding year and franchising start year for this "Tans" entity are not available, its current footprint firmly places it as an emerging player rather than a dominant force, offering a unique "Tans franchise opportunity" for early adopters. The broader context for this "Tans franchise investment" is the burgeoning global sports training market, which was valued at $27.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to surge to $50.7 billion by 2035, showcasing a robust and expanding total addressable market that could underpin significant growth for the right model. This independent analysis from PeerSense aims to cut through potential confusion, positioning "Tans" as a guide for investors by providing a clear, data-driven pathway to evaluate this specific "Tans franchise" opportunity, distinguishing it from the adjacent, yet distinct, tanning salon market.
The industry landscape for the "Tans franchise," officially categorized under Sports and Recreation Instruction, is characterized by substantial growth and evolving consumer preferences, signaling a fertile ground for strategic investment. The global sports training market, valued at an impressive $27.8 billion in 2023, is not merely static but is projected for significant expansion, expected to reach $50.7 billion by 2035, demonstrating a robust Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.2% from 2024 to 2035. This growth is further amplified by the broader global Sports Market, which is valued at USD 571.7 Billion in 2026 and is anticipated to achieve a staggering USD 1254.85 Billion by 2035, growing at a CAGR of approximately 9.13% from 2026 to 2035, highlighting powerful secular tailwinds benefiting sports-related businesses. Complementing these figures, the Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers Market, a closely related segment, recorded a value of USD 123.77 Billion in 2024 and is projected to climb to USD 180.44 Billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 4.06% from 2025-2033. Key consumer trends driving this demand include an increased focus on health and wellness, a high demand for personalized instruction, and the growing integration of technology into training methodologies. For instance, the Sports Coaching industry in Tennessee alone experienced an average annual growth rate of 6.1% from 2020 to 2025, with the number of businesses increasing by 5.3% and employees by 4.2% annually over the same period, underscoring strong regional demand within this category that attracts franchise investment. While the "Tans franchise" operates in this instruction sector, it is important to note the distinct competitive dynamics of the *tanning industry*, which, though related by name, faces different challenges, including a long-term decline in UV tanning due to health risks and a strategic shift towards spray tanning and premium beauty services, as evidenced by major players like Palm Beach Tan with over 600 locations and Sun Tan City with 256 units, illustrating a consolidated market adapting to macro forces.
Evaluating the investment specifics for the "Tans franchise" requires a nuanced approach, particularly given that crucial financial data such as the franchise fee, total investment range, liquid capital required, net worth required, royalty rate, and advertising fee are not available for this specific brand. This absence necessitates a broader contextual analysis, drawing comparisons from the adjacent personal care and wellness sectors, specifically tanning salons, which investors might initially associate with the "Tans" name. For instance, the "Tans franchise cost" in a related tanning segment can vary significantly: Tan Republic's initial franchise fee ranges from $5,000 to $25,000, with a total investment spanning $112,000 to $577,000, an 8% royalty rate, and a 2% marketing fund. Legally Tan, another tanning concept, charges a first-unit franchise fee of $49,500, with subsequent units discounted to $45,000 and $35,000 respectively, and requires a total investment ranging from $121,300 to $249,000, alongside a 6% royalty and 1% local advertising fee. A higher-tier option like Pure Glow Sunless Tanning Franchise demands an initial franchise fee of $50,000 per studio and a total investment range of $563,925 to $966,650, with a 7% royalty and 1% brand development fee. These examples provide benchmarks for the potential "Tans franchise investment" in a parallel industry, highlighting that investment accessibility can range from mid-tier to premium depending on the specific model and services offered. While specific financing details are not available for the "Tans" brand, similar franchises often offer incentives; for example, Tan Republic provides a 10% discount on the franchise fee for veterans and partners with third-party lenders for startup costs, while Legally Tan extends a 15% veteran discount. Understanding these industry comparables is vital for investors considering any "Tans franchise opportunity," even when direct data is not provided, to estimate potential capital requirements and ongoing obligations.
The operating model and support structure for the "Tans franchise" are not explicitly detailed in the provided data, which means prospective franchisees must infer typical expectations based on industry standards for sports and recreation instruction, supplemented by examples from the related tanning sector. While daily operations, specific staffing requirements, and format options (e.g., drive-thru, inline, kiosk) for this particular "Tans franchise" are not available, a successful franchise in the sports instruction category generally requires a robust curriculum, skilled instructors, and efficient scheduling systems. In the tanning salon industry, which shares some operational similarities in terms of customer service and facility management, training programs are often comprehensive: The Tan Company provides a business model, sales training, aggressive marketing programs, and ongoing training covering memberships and skincare products, leveraging years of hands-on experience. Tan Republic mandates a rigorous training curriculum, including one-on-one instruction and ongoing operational training for franchisees and designated managers within 60 days of signing the Franchise Agreement, with refresher programs offered periodically. Legally Tan offers an extensive 103-hour training program, comprising 29 hours of classroom instruction (in-person or virtual) and 74 hours of hands-on training at its Midland, Texas, corporate location, covering critical areas such as services, store build-out, equipment selection, software, compliance, inventory, and marketing. Glo Tanning and Palm Beach Tan both emphasize providing "proven systems and comprehensive support," while Sun Tan City offers "comprehensive training," marketing support, and a structured operational system, benefiting franchisees with proprietary systems and ongoing support. Sun Tan Miami also promises "elaborate training" and guidance "every step of the way." Territory information, while not specified for the "Tans franchise," often includes options like Tan Republic's "Regional Development" or "Area Development" models, which allow for multi-unit ownership and conversion of existing businesses, or Sun Tan City's strategic focus on locations near residential areas with specific demographic and income profiles, particularly in underserved suburban markets. Multi-unit opportunities are often available, as seen with Legally Tan offering discounts for additional units, and models can range from owner-operator to semi-absentee, with Legally Tan noting a "semi-absent role possible" and Pure Glow requiring 6-8 full-time and part-time employees for a typical studio size of 800-1,200 square feet.
For the "Tans franchise," Item 19 financial performance data is NOT disclosed in the current Franchise Disclosure Document, which means specific average revenue per unit, median revenue, or profit margins are not publicly available for this brand. This absence requires prospective investors to rely heavily on industry benchmarks and the brand's limited growth signals to infer potential unit-level performance for a "Tans franchise investment." In the broader Sports and Recreation Instruction industry, the projected growth to $50.7 billion by 2035 indicates a generally positive revenue environment. To provide a comparative perspective, looking at the related tanning salon industry, which often shares customer acquisition strategies and wellness-oriented services, some brands *do* disclose Item 19 data. For example, Legally Tan reported an average gross revenue of $497,001, with total expenses of $311,557, resulting in a net profit of $185,444. After accounting for royalties (6% or $29,820) and local advertising (1% or $4,970), Legally Tan’s adjusted net profit was $150,654, with an estimated payback period of 2 years, based on a model that typically requires 2 full-time or 4 part-time employees. Pure Glow Sunless Tanning Franchise also states that its FDD provides financial performance data for its two Boston locations in 2023, although specific numbers are not detailed in the provided snippets. These figures from the tanning sector offer a tangible benchmark for the unit-level profitability and "Tans franchise revenue" potential that *could* exist in a well-managed personal service franchise, underscoring the value of Item 19 disclosures for investor due diligence. Without such specific data for the "Tans" brand itself, investors must carefully weigh the broader industry growth against the inherent risks of an emerging brand with limited operational transparency, making the FPI Score of 53 (Moderate) a crucial indicator of overall franchise viability and risk.
The growth trajectory for the "Tans franchise" is currently in its nascent stages, evidenced by its small footprint of 3 total units and 4 franchised units, making it challenging to analyze historical net new unit trends over recent years. The fact that the number of franchised units (4) exceeds the total units (3) might indicate a unique reporting structure, that some units are in development, or that existing businesses have been converted into "Tans" franchises, an increasingly common strategy in the franchise world. While specific corporate developments for this "Tans" brand are not available, the broader personal care and wellness sectors, including tanning, offer compelling examples of aggressive growth and strategic adaptation. For instance, Palm Beach Tan nearly doubled its size in the last seven years through acquisitions, new construction, and franchise growth, notably acquiring 52 Ultra Tan locations across Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina in December 2022, expanding its reach to over 600 locations in 33 states. Glo Tanning stands out as "one of the fastest-expanding wellness franchises in the nation," recently setting a record for new store openings in a single year and slated to open over 40 stores in the current year, with 105 locations open and 250 in development by February 2026. Sun Tan City, another significant player, expanded rapidly, opening 22 franchised salons in Missouri and Michigan and its first Idaho location in January 2014, with expectations to open an additional 20 locations by March 2014, having already opened or converted 46 new franchise locations in 18 states in the preceding 12 months. Sun Tan Miami also boasts "continued growth over the last 5 years," expanding nationwide. These examples highlight that competitive moats in these industries often derive from strong brand recognition, strategic real estate selection, efficient operational systems, and diversification of services (e.g., spray tanning, red light therapy, infrared sauna) to adapt to evolving consumer preferences and health considerations. For the "Tans franchise" in sports instruction, a competitive advantage would likely stem from proprietary training methodologies, superior coaching talent, or innovative technology integration, rather than simply offering UV tanning services, as the industry shifts towards digital transformation and personalized wellness experiences.
Identifying the ideal franchisee for the "Tans franchise" requires an understanding of what drives success in the Sports and Recreation Instruction category, even though specific criteria for this brand are not available. Generally, a successful candidate would possess strong leadership and management skills, a passion for health and wellness, and an aptitude for community engagement, given the nature of sports instruction. While direct industry knowledge isn't always a prerequisite for franchise ownership, a background in operations or customer service can be highly beneficial. The multi-unit model is a common expectation in franchising, and while not specified for "Tans," other brands like Legally Tan actively encourage it, offering tiered discounts on franchise fees ($45,000 for the second unit, $35,000 for the third). Tan Republic also supports multi-unit expansion through "Regional Development" and "Area Development" models. For available territories, the "Tans franchise," headquartered in ARNOLD, MO, might initially target regional expansion, but the broader industry shows a nationwide appetite; Sun Tan Miami, for example, is "offering franchise locations nationwide." Ideal markets for sports instruction often mirror those for personal care, focusing on suburban areas with strong residential populations, stable median household incomes (e.g., above $50,000 as targeted by Sun Tan City), and demographics that include young professionals and college students. The timeline from signing to opening for a new "Tans franchise" is not available, but comprehensive training programs, such as Legally Tan's 103 hours of classroom and hands-on instruction, suggest a structured pre-opening phase. The franchise agreement term length and renewal terms are also not available for "Tans," but in similar franchises like Pure Glow Sunless Tanning, an initial term of ten years with two five-year renewal options is common, providing long-term stability.
The "Tans franchise" presents an intriguing, albeit early-stage, investment opportunity within the robust and expanding Sports and Recreation Instruction sector, a market projected to reach a substantial $50.7 billion by 2035. While the specific "Tans franchise cost," "Tans franchise fee," and "Tans franchise revenue" data are not disclosed, the brand’s small footprint of 3 total units (4 franchised) signifies considerable white space for growth for early adopters, particularly in an industry driven by increasing demand for personalized training and technological integration. This opportunity is distinct from the tanning salon market, which, despite its similar name, faces different industry dynamics and consumer shifts towards spray tanning and diversified wellness offerings. The FPI Score of 53 (Moderate) for "Tans" suggests a balanced risk-reward profile, warranting thorough due diligence. For investors seeking a "franchise opportunity" in a growing sector, understanding the unique positioning of the "Tans franchise" and its potential for scale is critical. PeerSense provides exclusive due diligence data including SBA lending history, FPI score, location maps with Google ratings, FDD financial data (where disclosed), and side-by-side comparison tools. Explore the complete Tans franchise profile on PeerSense to access the full suite of independent franchise intelligence data.
FPI Score
53/100
SBA Default Rate
0.0%
Active Lenders
3
Key Highlights
Franchise Financing Resources
Data Insights
Key performance metrics for Tans & Company based on SBA lending data
SBA Default Rate
0.0%
0 of 4 loans charged off
SBA Loan Volume
4 loans
Across 3 lenders
Lender Diversity
3 lenders
Avg 1.3 loans per lender
Investment Tier
Significant investment
$386,430 – $774,600 total
Tans & Company — Deep SBA Data
Brand-specific metrics derived directly from SBA 7(a) approval records — peak lending year, leading state, average loan size, and lender concentration. PeerSense computes these per brand so capital advisors and prospective franchisees can benchmark this opportunity against the rest of the franchise universe.
Peak SBA Year
2004
3 approvals — best year on record for Tans & Company.
Top SBA State
Missouri
3 SBA-financed Tans & Company locations — the densest operator footprint.
Average Loan Size
$258K
Median $263K — use as a sizing anchor when modeling your own $Tans & Company unit.
Lender Concentration
100%
Concentrated
Share of Tans & Company approvals captured by the top 3 SBA lenders.
Tans & Company's SBA lending pipeline peaked in 2004 (3 approvals). Operator density is highest in Missouri with 3 SBA-financed locations. Average funded ticket sits at $258K, with the median at $263K. Lender mix is concentrated: the top three SBA lenders account for 100% of approvals — credit decisions concentrate with a small group of incumbents.
Payment Estimator
Estimated Monthly Payment
$4,000
Principal & Interest only
Locations
Tans & Company — unit breakdown
Explore Funding for Tans & Company
Our business financing consultants help connect you with the right lending partners. No retainers — referral fee paid at closing.
Or get an instant analysis
Scan Your Deal Instantly1 FDD Available for Tans & Company
Review franchise fees, investment ranges, royalties, Item 19 financial data, and year-over-year trends. Request complimentary access through your PeerSense funding advisor.